Quite simply, we have become a surveillance state. Cameras — both those controlled by the state, and those installed by private entities — watch our every move, at least in public. For the most part, this public surveillance is unregulated, beyond the purview of the Fourth Amendment, and to many civil libertarians, should signal alarm. This Article challenges these assumptions, and suggests that in thinking about surveillance cameras and other technologies, we must listen to communities. For many communities, public surveillance not only has the benefit for deterring crime and aiding in the apprehension of criminals. In these communities, public surveillance can also function to monitor the police, reduce racial profiling, curb police brutality, and ultimately increase perceptions of legitimacy. The question thus becomes, not how we can use the Fourth Amendment to limit public surveillance, but rather how can we use the Fourth Amendment to harness public surveillance’s full potential.
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Crime, Surveillance, and Communities
Brooklyn Law School Professor of Law I. Bennett Capers has posted his latest article Crime, Surveillance, and Communities on SSRN. It is scheduled for publication in the Fordham Urban Law Journal later this year. The abstract reads:
Posted by Harold O'Grady at 5:28 PM