The report attributes the rise in law school tuition costs to competition for better rankings and a more hands-on approach to educating students for the increased price of a law degree rather than to accreditation standards of the American Bar Association. The report states that law schools are providing courses and student-support programs that require more staff and faculty. At the same time, the report noted decreases in state appropriations as a reason for rising tuition.
The report also addresses access to law schools and concludes that minorities are making up a larger share of law-school enrollments than in the past, despite a drop in the percentage of African-American students. In the academic years from 1994 to 2007, black students went from 7.5 percent of law school students to 6.5 percent, while the number of blacks earning bachelor's degrees grew two percent. Law school rankings may account for lower or static enrollment rates of minorities as "Schools are reluctant to admit applicants with lower LSAT scores because the median LSAT score is a key factor in the U.S. News & World Report rankings." Another posting on TaxProf Blog, U.S. News: GAO Wrong to Blame Us For Rising Law School Tuition, links to a contrary view in a U.S. News & World Report article, Who's at Fault for the High Cost of Law School?
2 comments:
I think Brooklyn Law School did not increase its tuition in 2009-2010. Is that correct?
In February 2009, Brooklyn Law School announced that is was freezing salaries for its employees. In a memo announcing the pay freeze to BLS students, the Dean said: "Over the past five years, annual tuition increases have been approximately 6.2% for entering students and 5% for upperc1ass students. I anticipate that any increase for the 2009-10 academic year will be substantially lower."
Post a Comment